Upload and Download Speed Capping Off at 54 Mbps

How many connection is made to the AP? What is the slowest device? Did you do a aqueduct survey and come across what aqueduct is least congested? I recommend inssider three.one.2.1 if you lot have not.

Was this postal service helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

Does your connection link say 54 Mbps or is that the transfer charge per unit y'all are getting?

What I am thinking is that your wireless card is but 1x1, so yous only go 1 data stream and the speeds you are seeing are right on.

OR, your network carte is only 802.11g capable.

Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

NIC driver wireless way setting?

Was this postal service helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

JM0176

Sometimes when a slower device connects, information technology drags down everyone else's connection speed.

Was this mail helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

@Harry:  For testing purposes I only have the two laptops connected to the AP

@dpaul: when I log in the laptop it says 54 mb/south and signal is excellent (bginfo says 54 as well)  1x1 card?  How can I tell?

@Merryworks:

Was this mail service helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

@Harry:  For testing purposes I only have the 2 laptops connected to the AP

@dpaul: when I log in the laptop information technology says 54 mb/southward and signal is splendid (bginfo says 54 as well)  1x1 menu?  How can I tell?

@Merryworks:

The 8260 is 2x2.

http://www.intel.com/content/www/u.s./en/wireless-products/wireless-product-selection-guide.html

Was this mail helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

Big Green Man wrote:

Garnock12 wrote:

@Harry:  For testing purposes I but have the ii laptops connected to the AP

@dpaul: when I log in the laptop it says 54 mb/southward and signal is excellent (bginfo says 54 equally well)  1x1 bill of fare?  How can I tell?

@Merryworks:

The 8260 is 2x2.

http://world wide web.intel.com/content/www/us/en/wireless-products/wireless-product-selection-guide.html

Then I should exist able to go faster correct?

Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

... Are y'all using WEP?  802.11n doesn't support WEP over 54mbit, which is a good matter!

Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

Garnock12 wrote:

Big Green Man wrote:

Garnock12 wrote:

@Harry:  For testing purposes I merely accept the two laptops connected to the AP

@dpaul: when I log in the laptop it says 54 mb/s and signal is excellent (bginfo says 54 as well)  1x1 bill of fare?  How can I tell?

@Merryworks:

The 8260 is 2x2.

http://world wide web.intel.com/content/www/u.s.a./en/wireless-products/wireless-production-selection-guide.html

Then I should be able to go faster correct?

Yes. Are these APs connected to a controller? If so, which one?

Was this mail service helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

Mike Dresser wrote:

... Are you using WEP?  802.11n doesn't support WEP over 54mbit, which is a skilful thing!

Actually yes WEP-128.  I too found this - the 8260 is ac capable only the highest wireless mode information technology shows on the laptop is thou??  guys I take to run get my son I'll check back here in the morning (or tonight if I can)


Was this postal service helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

Mike Dresser wrote:

... Are you using WEP?  802.11n doesn't back up WEP over 54mbit, which is a expert thing!

Actually aye WEP-128.  I too found this - the 8260 is ac capable but the highest wireless mode it shows on the laptop is g??  guys I have to run get my son I'll check back hither in the morn (or tonight if I tin)


Was this mail helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

Yeah, get off WEP.. WEP has been publicly compromised for at least fifteen years now.

You lot want WPA2-AES, or if this is a business organisation connection, strongly adopt WPA2-Enterprise, but you'll need a Radius server for that.

WPA using TKIP has holes of its own, and so WPA2-AES with a long passphrase.  64 characters isn't crazy.

Was this mail helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

Use WPA2-PSK with AES. Anything less is not even remotely secure, and using WEP or TKIP volition limit it to 54Mbps.

Gregg

Was this mail service helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

greggmh123 wrote:

Use WPA2-PSK with AES. Anything less is not even remotely secure, and using WEP or TKIP will limit it to 54Mbps.

Gregg

These are the options I have


Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

greggmh123 wrote:

Use WPA2-PSK with AES. Anything less is not even remotely secure, and using WEP or TKIP will limit it to 54Mbps.

Gregg

These are the options I have


Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

Garnock12 wrote:

greggmh123 wrote:

Utilise WPA2-PSK with AES. Anything less is non even remotely secure, and using WEP or TKIP will limit it to 54Mbps.

Gregg

These are the options I take

CCMP is AES-based. Apply the bottom one.

Was this mail helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

WPA2-CCMP is what you want, just a dissimilar proper noun for AES.

Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

Big Light-green Human being wrote:

Garnock12 wrote:

greggmh123 wrote:

Use WPA2-PSK with AES. Anything less is non even remotely secure, and using WEP or TKIP will limit it to 54Mbps.

Gregg

These are the options I have
CCMP is AES-based. Use the lesser ane.

When I select the bottom one information technology asks for a central but it doesn't have some of my keyboard presses???

Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

Garnock12 wrote:

Large Green Man wrote:

Garnock12 wrote:

greggmh123 wrote:

Use WPA2-PSK with AES. Anything less is not even remotely secure, and using WEP or TKIP will limit it to 54Mbps.

Gregg

These are the options I have
CCMP is AES-based. Use the bottom i.
When I select the bottom one it asks for a key but information technology doesn't have some of my keyboard presses???

At that place aren't whatsoever ASCII characters that are disallowed AFAIK. Might be a bug with your controller.

Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

AAHH AASCI  -  found the outcome - the hex box was checked

Was this mail helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

OK we are making progress.  Shows 130 at present!!  This is how the setup looks now.


Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

OK we are making progress.  Shows 130 now!!  This is how the setup looks now.


Was this mail helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

Whatever more ideas?

Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

Found this - non certain what MCS0 and MCS15 are but I know the HT40 theoretically doubles your throughput by using 2 next channels at once.  I can't effigy out how to admission this setting.


Was this postal service helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

Garnock12 wrote:

Plant this - non certain what MCS0 and MCS15 are but I know the HT40 theoretically doubles your throughput by using 2 next channels at in one case.  I tin can't figure out how to admission this setting.

Give this a read:

https://maitechnowiki.wordpress.com/wi-fi-terms-explained/

Was this post helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

I establish the HT settings under smart rf settings but information technology won't let me change information technology.  Information technology complains that I am entering an invalid value just I am picking the setting from a drop down (tried all with the aforementioned result).

Was this postal service helpful? thumb_up thumb_down

reyesarinalwas1948.blogspot.com

Source: https://community.spiceworks.com/topic/1970242-wifi-connection-speed-caps-at-54-mb-s

0 Response to "Upload and Download Speed Capping Off at 54 Mbps"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel